Welcome to TV Congress, Way to Win's analysis of Democratic messaging. This is based on data on broadcast ads, via AdImpact ad intelligence combined with data sourced from from The Downballot (formerly know as Daily Kos Elections). Please feel free to share screenshots from here or link to it at the canonincal URL (waytowin.us/tvcongress), credit "Way to Win TV Congress Media Analysis" where appropriate, and use #tvcongress for discussion on social media.
Presidential General By
Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser Type/Advertiser/Issue | By
Keyword
D $513.8M R $437.0 (Dem Spend Δ +17.6%)
Presidential Primary By
Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser Type/Advertiser/Issue
D $171.9M R
$211.0 (Dem Spend Δ -18.5%)
Future Forward vs MAGA Inc. By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser Type/Advertiser/Issue
| By
Keyword
Trump for Pres vs Harris for Pres By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser
Type/Advertiser/Issue | By Keyword
The Whole Enchilada (Presidential + Senate +
Congress) By
Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser Type/Advertiser/Issue | By
Keyword
D $1,808.6M R $1,702.1 (Dem Spend Δ +6.3%)
Top Creatives (Presidential General) All | Immigration | Economy
The Big House
Table
All races included - for competitive races (ones where
both D and R spending > $0), click the Dem Spending Differential
amount to see a breakdown of the ads in each competitive district.
Winnable districts are Trump districts where the 24 House Dem lost by
less than 5, and 3 Harris districts held by Rs.
All US House Ads By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser Type/Advertiser/Issue | By Keyword
All US Senate Ads By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | By Keyword
D $522.3M R $557.3 (Dem Spend Δ -1.0)%
All Outside Ads By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | All Outside Ads
By Keyword
House Issue
Groups
General + Primary: D $304.5 R $273.4 (Dem Spend Δ
+10.2%)
Senate Issue
Groups
General + Primary: D $274.6 R $450.4 (Dem Spend Δ
-64.0%)
AZ Senate
Gallego (D) 50.1% def
Lake (R) 47.7%
MI Senate
Slotkin (D) 48.6% def
Rogers (R) 48.3%
MT Senate
Sheehy
(R) 52.6% def
Tester (D) 45.5%
NV Senate
Rosen
(D) 47.9% def
Brown (R) 46.2%
OH Senate
Moreno
(R) 50.1% def
Brown (D) 46.5%
PA Senate
McCormick (R) 48.8% def
Casey (D) 48.6%
TX Senate | By Keyword
Cruz (R) 53.0% def
Allred (D) 44.6%
VA Senate
Kaine
(D) 54.4% def
Cao (R) 45.4%
WI Senate
Baldwin (D) 49.3% def
Hovde (R) 48.5%
For this cycle, we analyzed races at the national, state and governor levels. The primary links will take you to a page with breakdowns by party, party + tone (i.e. the message box), by advertiser, and by issue. (as coded by AdImpact) Read the 2022 summary memo for analysis from this cycle.
The Big House
Table
All races included - for competitive races (ones where
both D and R spending > $0), click the Dem Spending Differential
amount to see a breakdown of the ads in each competitive
district.
All US House Ads By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | US House Ads By Keyword
Likely 2024
Competitive Districts
D $241.7M R $192.4 (Dem Spend Δ
+25.6)%
(24 districts total: 18 where Biden won or 19 where the Dem
lost by less than 5)
All US Senate Ads By
Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | US Senate Ads By
Keyword
D $296.7M R $235.0 (Dem Spend Δ +26.3)%
All Outside Ads By
Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | All Outside Ads By
Keyword
House Issue
Groups
General Only: D $130.1 R $140.2 (Dem Spend Δ -7.8%)
General + Primary: D $153.8 R $190.0 (Dem Spend Δ -23.5%)
Senate Issue
Groups
General Only: D $140.6 R $157.3 (Dem Spend Δ
-11.9%)
General + Primary: D $182.5 R $258.5 (Dem Spend Δ
-41.6%)
Combined House
+ Senate By Party/Party+Tone/Advertiser/Issue | Combined
House + Senate By Keyword
Senate Crime and NOT Abortion ads | House Crime and NOT Abortion ads
AZ
Governor
Hobbs (D) 50.3% def Lake (R) 49.7%
AZ Senate
Kelly (D)
51.4% def Masters (R) 46.5%
FL Governor
DeSantis
(R) 59.4% def Crist (D) 40.0%
FL Senate
Rubio (R)
57.7% def Demings (D) 41.3%
GA Governor
Kemp (R)
53.4% def Abrams (D) 45.9%
GA Senate | By Keyword
Warnock (D) 51.4% def Walker (R) 48.6%
NV Governor
Lombardo
(R) 48.8% def Sisolak (D) 47.4%
NV Senate
Cortez Masto
(D) 48.9% def Laxalt (R) 48.0%
PA Governor Shapiro (D) 56.5% def Mastriano (R) 41.7%
PA Senate | By Keyword
Fetterman (D) 51.2% def Oz (R) 46.3%
WI Governor
Evers (D)
51.2% def Michels (R) 47.8%
WI Senate | By Keyword
Johnson (R) 50.5% def Barnes (D) 49.5%
Update: Greg Sargent interviewed the architect of this project, Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, and wrote up an excellent summary in the Washington Post, Can Democrats avoid the pitfalls of 2020? A new analysis offers striking answers.
The 2020 fight for the US Congress ended with a mix of good news and bad for Democrats. Democrats retained their majority, even while going zero for twenty seven in the the Cook Political-rated D and R tossup races. Centrist Democrats were quick to blame the left. Yet Republicans had publicly announced a strategy based on name-calling early in the cycle, in February of 2019. It seems possible that a more aggressive strategy to combat it could have been waged - an argument advanced by Justice Democrats and other groups in their preliminary 2020 analysis. While research alone will not lead to persuasive, powerful, and emotionally resonant ads, it is of particular necessity when communicating with exactly the kinds of divese audiences that proved pivotal in many districts. In many races, these groups of voters had been categorized as "mobilization" segments, and were thus deprioritized for spending and focus.
The good news is that Democratic leadership has already begun taking aggressive action to address these issues. When Rep Maloney was elected to run the DCCC, one of his first actions was to end the blacklist that had limited new consulting firms from competing. But given the historic challenges Democrats face in 2022, it's going to take a lot more than this. To support this effort, Way to Win commissioned a study of the overall 2020 message landscape. These interactive tools were one result.
Many thanks to Dailykos Elections Data for their excellent work, and to AdImpact for allowing these views of their datasets to be made public. If you'd like to inquire about their ad intelligence or obtaining copies of their data for post-cycle analysis, please contact John Link at AdImpact directly.
The interactive tables are not mobile adapted. Please view them on a larger screen. Please feel free to share screenshots from here or link to it, and credit "Way to Win analysis of AdImpact, DailyKos Elections, and Cook Political data by Dan Ancona."
The previous image, but in the iconic style of the cover of Joy Divison's 1979 release, Unknown Pleasures. Many thanks to James Home for getting the design execution just right.